The other night I was watching the news at the gym, and there were two big stories:
1) The gunman in Virginia
2) The Supreme Court decision to uphold a partial birth abortion ban
The focus in reporting on the first was on the madness of this kid who somehow thought that he had the right to determine who was fit to live.
The focus in reporting on the second was on the madness of groups who said that killing a child--oh, wait, fetus--halfway delivered should not happen.
Most of the people I heard talking about the court case were upset, saying that this could lead to further bans. And one person said something like, "Well, this just means the fetus will have to be dismembered inside the mother, which is dangerous for the patient."
The difference between what happened at Virginia Tech and what happens in clinics across the country must be that life experience grants you the right to expect that there are safe environments in which people will not kill you. Which explains why we value our elderly so much, right? The cumulation of life experience?
In the reporting on the Supreme Court decision, some people were expressing concerns over having women required to view ultrasounds or learn more about the abortion process before going through with it. Isn't that a championing of uninformed choice? Or the right to choose what a somebody tells you to choose? Are they afraid that the women might think, "That looks like a baby...a human baby. I can't kill it!"
If that's so, given what happened last Monday, they don't have grounds to get too concerned.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment